Skip to main content

Conservatives Use The Devastating Case Of Alfie Evans To Falsely Discredit Single-Payer Healthcare



American conservatives such as Steven Crowder, among many others, have began using their ridiculously low level of understanding about UK healthcare and the harrowing case of 1 year old Alfie Evans in order to push back against the growing popularity of a single-payer system being implemented in the United States. Crowder has stated that "the state chose to let Alfie Evans die", which isn't the case whatsoever but that doesn't matter to people such as Steven Crowder, who has a history of lying to his audience.

While Crowder pretends that the UK Government had the final say on whether or not Alfie's parents would be allowed to take him from Alder Hay Hospital in Liverpool to a hospital in Rome that had suggested it could possibly save Alfie's life, that's simply untrue.

The Alfie Evans case was between doctors at the Alder Hay Hospital and the UK High Court of Justice (Family Division). Because of the fact that Alfie was suffering from an undiagnosed neurodegenerative disorder, the medical team at Alder Hay thought, to the best of their knowledge, that the best thing to do was to end Alfie's suffering and allow him to pass away peacefully, calling the parents wishes to keep Alfie on life support "unkind and inhumane".

Of course the case can be made that Alfie was an unwitting party in this legal battle as he has no idea what would be going on, much like myself and Steven Crowder. On one hand the parents wanted to do everything they could in order to save Alfie and prolong his life, while on the other hand the doctors knew that this was an undiagnosed disease and Alfie would most likely be living in extreme pain.
Alfie Evans in Alder Hay Hospital - (Image: PA)

Alfie unfortunately suffers seizures 95% of the time that physiotherapists are monitoring his condition, with 80% of those seizures as a result of him simply being touched. Medical professionals told Liverpool Family Court that Alfie's brain had shrunk because of the underlying 'untreatable' degenerative condition, which had left a "gaping black void" surrounding his brain, which would only get bigger as his brain degenerated. While making further claims that "the absolute consensus of every doctor in every country in this case that we are talking about with Alfie is terminal."

Alfie's parents, Kate and Tom at Liverpool Crown Court - (Image: Daily Mirror)
It is completely understandable for Alfie's parents to want to take any chance possible to prolong his life and felt like their son was essentially being held against their will, while the judge, Mr Justice Hayden, only had the doctors medical knowledge and opinions to rely upon. Mr Justice Hayden stated that "Alfie might die in transit. It's on my watch, and I've made it very clear that I don't like it." Mr Evans, Alfie's father, responded: "If we leave him in bed in hospital we are achieving nothing. There's less risks but there's still risks - he's getting infections."
Another way in which Steven Crowder is being extremely disingenuous with the facts surrounding the Alfie Evans case, as the Daily Mirror reports, there are several rumours being spread within the Italian media about the case, such as Alfie being denied life-saving treatment close to his death. So, what does Crowder do? Well, he publishes an article on his website also suggesting that the hospital and/or the State literally gave Alfie Evans a concoction of drugs which was what actually killed him. Completely unfounded of course, but that's just Crowder.

The article titled "BREAKING: Alfie Evans Given FOUR Drugs Before He Died", suggests the Alder Hay Hospital basically killed Alfie, with the writer even likening it to the "Obamacare Death Panels" which have been debunked more times than I've had hot dinners. The article on Crowder's websites links to 'LifeSiteNews' and guess what their source for this claim is? The exact same Italian media sources that the Daily Mirror reported on and that the parents asked that people not listen to or take seriously. So, Steven Crowder, you're full of sh*t, my friend.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MSNBC Host Lawrence O'Donnell Explains How The Democratic Party Treats The Left

MSNBC's "The Last Word" host Lawrence O'Donnell describes his politics as a "practical European socialist", which essentially boils down to being a nordic-style social democrat, usually in favour of a mixed economy with a generous welfare state and has defended his positions on MSNBC news shows that typically frown upon stepping outside the neoliberal bubble. O'Donnell is no progressive hero in the context of american politics, sometimes scolding progressive politicians whenever they mildly criticize the Democratic Party, such as when Bernie Sanders tweeted about having to take on the Democratic establishment as well as Republicans, O'Donnell decided to concern troll Sanders by claiming that the Democratic establishment wouldn't pass Sanders' proposals if he wasn't nice to them. Over the course of the last few months an old video of O'Donnell explaining how to move the Democratic Party further left and how the party treats the p

MSNBC News Caught Faking Poll Numbers To Elevate Biden Above Bernie Sanders

If you were to believe recent polling figures in regards to the Democratic Primaries, Joe Biden is by far and away one of the most popular political figures in America, with his 2020 poll numbers giving him a 37 and 32 point lead over Bernie Sanders in the recent past. There has however been issues with some of the polls that have been undertaken and given Joe Biden his huge lead, such as the one pictured above, which shows Bernie leading Biden by 2% (27%-25%) among non-white voters, but you wouldn’t know that if you watched the MSNBC segment regarding the poll, in which Biden magically gains three percentage points in order to go ahead of Bernie in these demographics. Here’s another poll (CNN) that was used in order to show Sanders “plummeting support” and as you can see the poll includes zero respondents of anyone under the age of fifty. The problem being that Sanders base of support is largely made up of younger voters, so to not include any in a poll on Sanders is simply di

Sally Albright: I'd Prefer 4 More Years Of Trump Than President Bernie Sanders

One of the main talking points used against Bernie Sanders and his supporters is that their lack of enthusiasm and support for Hillary Clinton in 2016 directly led to Donald Trump becoming president, with Sanders supporters being labelled as privileged and sexist for not backing Clinton, and yes that includes you misogynistic Jill Stein/Green Party voters! However, our favourite anti-Bernie Democratic loyalist, Sally Albright, now insists that it isn’t pivotal that you support the Democratic nominee in order to defeat Donald Trump, should Sanders win the 2020 Democratic nomination. Albright recently claimed that “ 4 more years of Trump would be better in the long run ” as opposed to a President Bernie Sanders. This comes after the “moderate” wing of the Democratic Party have spent the past three years suggesting that apathetic Sanders supporters are the cause of every terrible Trump decision and we’d be in a utopia if us sexists would have just fell in line behind Clinton. In