Skip to main content

Why The Labour Party Lost The UK Election

Whichever way you approach the recent UK election, it would be fair to say that the Labour Party experienced a drubbing, resulting in a loss of 60 seats and handing the Conservative Party a large parliamentary majority. There has however been a fierce debate surrounding the reasons for Labour’s defeat, reasons ranging from Brexit, Jeremy Corbyn himself or supposedly racist voters.

This debate has deeply spilt the two main factions of the Labour Party, between moderates and progressives. Blairites vs Corbynistas if you will. Moderates place the blame solely at the feet of Jeremy Corbyn, his supposed anti-semitism and poor electability. Progressives see this defeat as a result of a Brexit backlash with many Leave voters leaving the Labour Party while the Conservative Party had one core message: “Get Brexit Done” which seemingly resonated.

It is fair to suggest that Corbyn’s popularity isn’t exactly soaring, with the mere mention of his name bringing about a whole range of different opinions. I believe it would also be fair to say that Brexit had a sizeable impact on the election.

Should you believe everything said about Jeremy Corbyn on social media, news shows or the papers, this is a man who is supposedly anti-Semitic, a supporter of terrorists, a racist, a spy for Russia and the Czech Republic, a communist and a traitor. With these slanderous claims being blasted on to millions of British televisions and newspapers, is it any wonder people who consume the news this way don’t have a particularly favourable view of Corbyn?

In order to fully understand the reasons behind Labour's poor result, we should delve into each of the 60 seats that Labour lost and its percentage of the Leave vote in the 2016 European Union referendum. Looking at the 60 seats in this fashion paints a rather striking picture, with almost every English seat being in a majority Leave constituency, with a couple of understandable exemptions, such as Kensington, the area of the Grenfell Tower disaster, in which former Tory minister Sam Gyimah, who defected to the Liberal Democrats, split the vote between himself and the Labour Party candidate, resulting in the Conservatives gaining the seat.

The Labour Party were stuck between a rock and a hard place in both England and Scotland. In England, Brexit was dividing the country. Seats like Ashfield having a 70.5% Leave vote, Bolsover (70.4% Leave), Hyndburn (65.8% Leave), Redcar (67.7% Leave), Scunthorpe (68.7% Leave), Stoke-on-Trent North (72.1% Leave) - noticing a pattern yet?

Immediately following the EU Referendum, the Labour Party's stance was to accept the result, accept that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union and attempt to get the best deal possible, mainly focusing on protections for migrant and worker rights as opposed to a 'Hard Brexit'. However, as Brexit was a deeply dividing issue, Remainers and anti-Brexit parties such as the Greens and Liberal Democrats demanded that everyone pick a side between Leave and Remain. Jeremy Corbyn and his allies in the party knew leaning too far to one side who result in large swathes of voters leaving the party - if Labour heavily backed Leave, their voters would jump ship to the Greens or Lib Dems and if they heavily backed Remain then their voters would jump ship to the Conservative Party, which is exactly what happened.

Meanwhile in Scotland, a country yearning for a second independence vote and which voted to overwhelmingly remain in the European Union, voted accordingly, with the SNP (Scottish National Party) winning 48 of the 59 Scottish seats on offer, an increase of 13 from the 2017 General Election. The SNP were the only party offering another independence referendum and had the best chance to win all Scottish seats, so many Labour Party voters, myself included, tactically voted for the Scottish National Party in order to keep the Tories out of as many seats as possible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MSNBC Host Lawrence O'Donnell Explains How The Democratic Party Treats The Left

MSNBC's "The Last Word" host Lawrence O'Donnell describes his politics as a "practical European socialist", which essentially boils down to being a nordic-style social democrat, usually in favour of a mixed economy with a generous welfare state and has defended his positions on MSNBC news shows that typically frown upon stepping outside the neoliberal bubble. O'Donnell is no progressive hero in the context of american politics, sometimes scolding progressive politicians whenever they mildly criticize the Democratic Party, such as when Bernie Sanders tweeted about having to take on the Democratic establishment as well as Republicans, O'Donnell decided to concern troll Sanders by claiming that the Democratic establishment wouldn't pass Sanders' proposals if he wasn't nice to them. Over the course of the last few months an old video of O'Donnell explaining how to move the Democratic Party further left and how the party treats the p

MSNBC News Caught Faking Poll Numbers To Elevate Biden Above Bernie Sanders

If you were to believe recent polling figures in regards to the Democratic Primaries, Joe Biden is by far and away one of the most popular political figures in America, with his 2020 poll numbers giving him a 37 and 32 point lead over Bernie Sanders in the recent past. There has however been issues with some of the polls that have been undertaken and given Joe Biden his huge lead, such as the one pictured above, which shows Bernie leading Biden by 2% (27%-25%) among non-white voters, but you wouldn’t know that if you watched the MSNBC segment regarding the poll, in which Biden magically gains three percentage points in order to go ahead of Bernie in these demographics. Here’s another poll (CNN) that was used in order to show Sanders “plummeting support” and as you can see the poll includes zero respondents of anyone under the age of fifty. The problem being that Sanders base of support is largely made up of younger voters, so to not include any in a poll on Sanders is simply di

Sally Albright: I'd Prefer 4 More Years Of Trump Than President Bernie Sanders

One of the main talking points used against Bernie Sanders and his supporters is that their lack of enthusiasm and support for Hillary Clinton in 2016 directly led to Donald Trump becoming president, with Sanders supporters being labelled as privileged and sexist for not backing Clinton, and yes that includes you misogynistic Jill Stein/Green Party voters! However, our favourite anti-Bernie Democratic loyalist, Sally Albright, now insists that it isn’t pivotal that you support the Democratic nominee in order to defeat Donald Trump, should Sanders win the 2020 Democratic nomination. Albright recently claimed that “ 4 more years of Trump would be better in the long run ” as opposed to a President Bernie Sanders. This comes after the “moderate” wing of the Democratic Party have spent the past three years suggesting that apathetic Sanders supporters are the cause of every terrible Trump decision and we’d be in a utopia if us sexists would have just fell in line behind Clinton. In