Skip to main content

Chuck Schumer And Nancy Pelosi Keep Getting George Floyd's Name Wrong



In a bid to annoy as many people as possible Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are unable to even to honor the memory of George Floyd appropriately and don't seem even remotely interested in delivering any form of change to the system that led to Floyd's death.

Both Schumer and Pelosi had trouble giving Floyd the decency of even remembering his name, something that surely isn't as hard as it seems considering his name has been all over international news for the past month. 

Schumer, in an address to congress, said "for the families of Floyd Taylor, uh, George Taylor". Where Schumer got the idea that George Floyd has 'Taylor' anywhere in his name is anyone's guess, but this does show that Schumer isn't serious about delivering meaningful change to policing or the issue of systemic racism in America.

Following in Schumer's pathetic footsteps, Nancy Pelosi couldn't even give Floyd some basic decency by remembering his name. During a press conference Pelosi said "I only will do that if you tell me this legislation is worthy of George Kirby's name". 

This also came after Democrats decided to take part in a ridiculous photo op in which they kneeled in the halls of congress while wearing Ghanaian Kente cloth and took a moment of silence. This stunt was almost universally mocked as it showed that the Democrats aren't remotely serious in proposing the serious change that is needed after the killing of Floyd at the hands of the police, just more half measures and watered down policies that appease Republicans.

Ever since Floyd's death, actual legislative change has been hard to come by. Plenty of Instagram users decided that changing their profile pictures to black squares for a couple of days was just about enough activism for them, while virtually every brand and corporation posted a small message to social media about how we should all be nice to each other despite the fact that African Americans are hit much harder by the COVID-19 pandemic and make up the vast majority of lowest-paying service jobs, such as restaurant servers or retail workers, the same workers many of these brands and corporations swiftly sacked when COVID struck.

Even worse are the ideas that have been elevated to a national stage which are frankly laughable, such as "8 Can't Wait". While protestors and progressive groups made their intentions clear, wanting police budgets slashed and to be directed back into other public services, demilitarising the police force and actions of police brutality to be investigated impartially instead of overtly biased internal investigations. 8 Can't Wait instead gave us things such as banning chokeholds, requiring de-escalation measures, requiring a warning before shooting, comprehensive reporting of police actions and filming of the police via body cameras. 

This sounds all well and good until you actually realise that chokeholds were already banned by police departments like the NYPD in 1993 and yet an NYPD officer killed Eric Garner in 2014 via chokehold and another NYPD officer was caught on video in late June this year placing a man in a 'banned' chokehold. Police officers are already required to use de-escalation measures and warning civilians before they fire a single shot, yet we've already seen that with the death of Breonna Taylor, a Black woman killed by police entering her home while she slept, seemingly police instead use a policy of 'shoot first, ask questions later'. Frankly the notion that having police officers filling out paperwork will reduce instances of police brutality is utterly ridiculous and the problem with relying on police body cameras is that officers simply turn them off, much like they did during the protests following Floyd's murder, as well as covering up their badge numbers so that they couldn't be identified for their actions by the public later on. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MSNBC Host Lawrence O'Donnell Explains How The Democratic Party Treats The Left

MSNBC's "The Last Word" host Lawrence O'Donnell describes his politics as a "practical European socialist", which essentially boils down to being a nordic-style social democrat, usually in favour of a mixed economy with a generous welfare state and has defended his positions on MSNBC news shows that typically frown upon stepping outside the neoliberal bubble. O'Donnell is no progressive hero in the context of american politics, sometimes scolding progressive politicians whenever they mildly criticize the Democratic Party, such as when Bernie Sanders tweeted about having to take on the Democratic establishment as well as Republicans, O'Donnell decided to concern troll Sanders by claiming that the Democratic establishment wouldn't pass Sanders' proposals if he wasn't nice to them. Over the course of the last few months an old video of O'Donnell explaining how to move the Democratic Party further left and how the party treats the p

MSNBC News Caught Faking Poll Numbers To Elevate Biden Above Bernie Sanders

If you were to believe recent polling figures in regards to the Democratic Primaries, Joe Biden is by far and away one of the most popular political figures in America, with his 2020 poll numbers giving him a 37 and 32 point lead over Bernie Sanders in the recent past. There has however been issues with some of the polls that have been undertaken and given Joe Biden his huge lead, such as the one pictured above, which shows Bernie leading Biden by 2% (27%-25%) among non-white voters, but you wouldn’t know that if you watched the MSNBC segment regarding the poll, in which Biden magically gains three percentage points in order to go ahead of Bernie in these demographics. Here’s another poll (CNN) that was used in order to show Sanders “plummeting support” and as you can see the poll includes zero respondents of anyone under the age of fifty. The problem being that Sanders base of support is largely made up of younger voters, so to not include any in a poll on Sanders is simply di

Sally Albright: I'd Prefer 4 More Years Of Trump Than President Bernie Sanders

One of the main talking points used against Bernie Sanders and his supporters is that their lack of enthusiasm and support for Hillary Clinton in 2016 directly led to Donald Trump becoming president, with Sanders supporters being labelled as privileged and sexist for not backing Clinton, and yes that includes you misogynistic Jill Stein/Green Party voters! However, our favourite anti-Bernie Democratic loyalist, Sally Albright, now insists that it isn’t pivotal that you support the Democratic nominee in order to defeat Donald Trump, should Sanders win the 2020 Democratic nomination. Albright recently claimed that “ 4 more years of Trump would be better in the long run ” as opposed to a President Bernie Sanders. This comes after the “moderate” wing of the Democratic Party have spent the past three years suggesting that apathetic Sanders supporters are the cause of every terrible Trump decision and we’d be in a utopia if us sexists would have just fell in line behind Clinton. In